A defendant who was alleged of rape appealed his judgment. He cited two
errors to the trial court. First of all, that they erred in originally
denying his motion to suppress testimony from the victim procured at a
Child Advocacy Center. Second, the defendant claimed the court erred in
not granting his original motion to suppress statements that he made to
police when they interviewed him at his home. In conviction of sex offenses,
no error in admitting statements of child victim to forensic interviewer
where the statements were useful in diagnosis and treatment of the conditions
resulting from abuse and were an exception to hearsay, Evid.R. 803(4).
Call or text 614-884-1100 or complete a Free Case Evaluation form
